May 2, 2026

Jun 4, 2025

Jun 4, 2025

Feb 10, 2023

Nov 25, 2022

Sep 20, 2022

Thanks for pointing out. Even though the SDK gives a warning ("Gates must have jetway"), it's possible to export the scenery with only Gates as parking positions. I will implement this for the next update! But are you sure on the GA ramps A1-A6 there should be a GATE instead assigned? Wouldn't that possibly make airliners pop up there?

Don't think that gates actually need to be selected as type gate small/medium/heavy to be actually used by large AI airplanes. I think the parking spot radius matters though. I am working on a freeware scenery where a lot of gates are marked as ga ramps and i have seen many ai aircrafts like a320/737 s park on those. Also there is an option to name a parking spot as gate even if they are of type ramp in the SDK. That way you can avoid the gate missing jetway warning.

A1-A6 needs to be RAMP , the rest of the airport should be GATE. That way you wont see any GA traffic on the commercial apron. Since AIG airlines for exampme are defined as GATE in their airlines.cfg file this will ve correct. The same goes for AIG Cargo airlines. I dont believe MSFS supports the prefix CARGO jet so a small downside is that you may see Seiftair snd BlyeBird Nordic park at a jetway stand.

Sep 19, 2022

Hi there, you might want to download this mod: https://flightsim.to/file/40666/modification-of-scenery-wolkenblau-gcxo-payware-for-gsx-pro-users it removes 2D passengers and the default VDGS screens and lets you place your own. An updated version with 3D passengers will follow in a few weeks then.

Sep 16, 2022

Hi, first off thanks everbody for your purchases and for the nice comments. Regarding VDGS: as far as I can see, I will need to buy a commercial license from a 3rd party developer, as creating my own system from scratch exceeds my abilities as a developer. (If anybody knows a cost free solution let me know). I will look into doing so, as I know it's important for the users. However, I need to refinance the license costs first so please bear with me for the time being. Regarding 2D passengers: that solution was part of my concept to keep framerates low, together with the extensive usage of LOD models. I feel that a smooth running scenery is part of a decent product. 3D passengers however have a high mesh count and will likely slow down the scenery. Maybe you guys can give me an idea whether you are willing to trade better framerates for it. [If you don't like the 2D passengers for now, here's a small tweak how to get rid of them: download this .dds file https://fastupload.io/en/CxJHmgLNMDx4sVG/file and copy and paste it into your Tenerife Norte/scenery/models/texture directory and replace the existing file]

Thanks a lot for your answer and the file for hiding the passengers! I would prefer having 3D passengers since I have seen other sceneries do it while still having high framerates so if that's possible that would be great but if not I will just continue using the ones from GSX. Totally understandable not having VDGS at the moment considering the costs. In the meantime maybe you could add an option for us GSX users to hide the static VDGS so we can use the VDGS from GSX without it overlapping with the scenery one?

Allright, I could provide an additional .bgl file to replace the default one, that will make the default VDGS disappear. Let me ask you; will you need the poles without the screens or no poles and no screen at all? (see picture for reference) https://i.ibb.co/YTYQ7yj/8.jpg

Just removing the screens would probably be the best option, thanks!

Sep 15, 2022

Una pena que no sea compatible con la zona de aproximación en photogrametria creado por ezro. Sino lo compraba sin pensarlo

Sep 15, 2022